Spring 2012
By Lauren Painter
Terrence Malick's The Tree of Life is strange, exhilarating, exasperating, gorgeous, ponderous, insightful, epic, and beautiful, attempting nothing more than to ponder existence and view it through the eyes of a few human beings. The basic plot circles around the O’Brien family--the husband-wife pair (Brad Pitt and Jessica Chastain) and three sons in the mid-1950s in Waco, Texas. The audience is simultaneously introduced to the eldest son, Jack, as a child (Hunter McCracken) and as an adult (Sean Penn). The film deals with religious matters as well, inquiring about God, birth, evolution of life, Earth, and asking various head-tilting questions. While there are jumps in time, writer/director Malick is successfully able to tell the story through a different kind of development. But that is precisely why everyone should see this movie at least once, because it is a developmental film that includes beautiful nature and fantastic space imagery during what would regularly be a conservative family drama.
Similar to all of Malick’s films, The Tree of Life
is more like a poem than a film with the use of beautiful imagery and
cinematography. The cinematographer, Emmanuel Lubezki, brings his most
phenomenal work to the table in this flick. His choice of natural
lightning, the beautiful, vibrant, eye-catching colors, and his framing
is breathtaking because every second of this film recites a story. Shots
of hot geysers, planetary movements, bacteria, cells, molecules,
jellyfish, beach shores and flowing oceans lead into a dinosaur touching
another injured beast – a scene of prehistoric grace and compassion.
These aren't special effects, but ideas. They are risky but perplexing,
beautiful images. What Malick presents in this film is the evolution of
the universe as well as the evolution of human beings; both are
represented through nature, space, and time. Malick places these images
of nature in contrast with one another. He uses the cosmic events that
were the pillars of evolution to describe life on Earth, and he sends a
message about our insignificance in the grand scale of things, such as:
“Where were you when I laid the earth’s foundation?” But the
cinematography does not cease there. Meteor collision and volcanic
eruptions lead into bodies in the universe and the cellular lives on
earth. Malick makes use of the ocean and water to display the stages of
birth, which is truly a masterpiece. The camera in The Tree of Life floats like an angel, the images and scenes gliding us along and washing us in the ways of nature and the ways of grace.
As well as the outstanding cinematography, the most distinguished aspect of The Tree of Life
is the acting. All of the acting seemed genuine and unforced. With this
film, Brad Pitt reminded the audience that he is a phenomenally
talented actor. He completely grasps the role of the father – from a
young man, to an older man, to a graying man – whose sensitive
sense-of-self relies on the consistent respect of his family. Although
Pitt is a celebrity, he was still able to personify his character to
such an extent that the audience could overlook his real-life
reputation. The most memorable scene was also the most complex one,
where the family is eating dinner and from the other side of the table,
the fragile youngest son speaks impulsively to Pitt in a blunt voice,
“Be quiet.” Pitt’s astonishment at his sons’ disrespect and his
response, “What did you say?” is more hurt than anger. After processing
this, he releases his rage on the son. But the surprise was that it was
not about destroying anything but containing it and being able to have
control of it all: shoving Jack into a room when he tried to defend
himself, blocking out the rejection by making his back-talking son sit
outside, then returning to the dinner table to finish his meal in
embarrassment. Another actor worth recognizing is Hunter McCracken as
the child version of Jack, whose acting abilities had the elusive
maturity of an actor beyond his years. He plays his character very real,
complete with all the limitations and uncertainties of childhood and
youth. The mother, Jessica Chastain, was also spot-on, because the
characters in The Tree of Life seem to be more than what they
appear on the surface. She is angelic yet weak. It is also worth
mentioning how little dialogue there is in this film. All the actors
often had to communicate with expressions, actions, body language, and
behaviors rather than verbal words.
The Tree of Life
is definitely an adult movie with regards to the ideas, themes, and
content. It’s also a movie to reflect upon, to try and piece together in
recall. Watching the movie is an experience in itself it is not a
feasible task to comprehend it right away, which is why it is not
recommended to see it only once. It is more than likely a viewer will
get more from this film after seeing three or more times. But that is
the joy and fun of watching mind-boggling films like this one. The Tree of Life
is a phenomenal movie and should be seen by all types of audiences
because of its new approach to the industry. It grasps concepts and
displays them through the use of the amazing cinematography and acting.
Malick encounters notions about what it means to create a movie by
delivering something that is diverse and abnormal, yet entirely
successful. During a time where remakes and sequels are trending and
popular, originality will always stand out, and that is why The Tree of Life will not be a movie easily forgotten.
No comments:
Post a Comment